QUANTITATIVE REASONING · 2026 SOURCE MAP

Model the relationship.
Then move the numbers.

Start with the exact ADA section contract, then connect every displayed scope line to an observable study outcome. The map makes calculator use, units, assumptions, and evidence limits visible before timed practice begins.

40official questions
45official minutes
30 + 10math + applied split
✓digital calculator

READ THE CONTRACT CORRECTLY

One published split.
No invented subtopic quotas.

The ADA publishes a 40-question total and a 30 mathematical / 10 applied-mathematics split. Inside the mathematical group it lists Algebra, Data Analysis, Interpretation, and Sufficiency, Quantitative Comparison, and Probability and Statistics.

It does not publish item quotas for those mathematical subtopics. DAT TRAIN’s 18 objectives are a study organization—not an estimate of test frequency. Subtopic weights published: no.

A FOUR-PASS SOLVING ROUTINE

Model. Solve. Check. Decide.

The calculator can accelerate arithmetic. It cannot choose the relationship, restore a dropped unit, or prove that a comparison is determined.

  1. 1

    Model

    Name the target. Translate the relationship. Attach units and restrictions before entering numbers.

  2. 2

    Solve

    Choose the shortest valid path: algebra, estimation, a bound, a table, a graph, or a controlled calculator step.

  3. 3

    Check

    Test sign, scale, unit, domain, and substitution. Reject precision that the prompt cannot support.

  4. 4

    Decide

    Answer the exact question asked—especially for comparison and sufficiency, where a full numerical solution may be unnecessary.

CALCULATOR-AWARE, NOT CALCULATOR-LED

Set up first. Estimate second. Key in last.

The official interface supplies a digital calculator for this section. Use it after the model is stable, then compare the display with an expected sign and scale. A polished decimal produced by the wrong equation is still wrong.

THE COMPLETE OFFICIAL SCOPE

Two groups. Ten displayed leaves.

Open a problem group, then a topic. Each topic keeps the official wording and adds bounded DAT TRAIN outcomes, prerequisite links, common traps, representations, and free learning references.

I

Mathematical Problems

30 official questions · 9 displayed leaves · 16 DAT TRAIN objectives

A1

Equations and expressions

2 observable outcomes

01
Translate structure before simplifying

Convert verbal or nested algebraic relationships into an expression or equation while preserving grouping, sign, and unit meaning.

Must know
  • Operation order follows the written structure, including grouping symbols and fraction bars.
  • A variable expression represents a relationship; an equation adds an equality constraint.
Evidence boundary

Do not infer a missing domain restriction, unit, or relationship that the prompt does not supply.

Common trap

Words can be translated in the order they appear. Relational phrases determine grouping and operation direction before arithmetic begins.

02
Solve and verify equations

Solve linear, quadratic, rational, or simultaneous equations at the stated level and verify candidates in the original constraints.

Must know
  • Equivalent transformations preserve the solution set only when their conditions are respected.
  • Substitution into the original equation catches extraneous or excluded values.
Evidence boundary

No advanced mathematics or calculus; choose methods supported by the supplied algebraic structure.

Common trap

Every value produced by an algebraic manipulation is a solution. Squaring, clearing denominators, and other conditional moves can create candidates that fail the original equation.

A2

Inequalities

2 observable outcomes

01
Preserve order through transformations

Solve one-variable inequalities and express the complete solution set using symbols, intervals, or a number line.

Must know
  • Multiplying or dividing by a negative reverses the inequality direction.
  • Strict and inclusive boundaries produce different endpoint notation.
Evidence boundary

Report the full solution region rather than selecting a convenient test value as the answer.

Common trap

An inequality sign behaves exactly like an equals sign under every operation. Order reverses under multiplication or division by a negative quantity.

02
Resolve compound and absolute inequalities

Combine intersection or union conditions and test boundary regions for compound, rational, or absolute-value inequalities.

Must know
  • ‘And’ usually describes an intersection; ‘or’ usually describes a union.
  • Critical points partition the number line into regions whose signs can be tested.
Evidence boundary

A sign chart establishes interval behavior; it does not authorize cancellation across a zero denominator.

Common trap

Two boundary values imply every value between them works. The operator and sign pattern determine whether the middle, outside, or separate regions satisfy the condition.

A3

Exponential notation

1 observable outcome

01
Control exponential notation

Apply exponent and scientific-notation rules while preserving sign, base, reciprocal, and order-of-magnitude meaning.

Must know
  • Exponent rules apply to matching bases and to complete products or quotients, not arbitrary sums.
  • A negative exponent creates a reciprocal; it does not make the value negative.
Evidence boundary

Keep exact form until the requested precision is known; do not manufacture significant digits.

Common trap

A negative exponent means a negative result. It indicates reciprocal power; the base determines the sign.

A4

Absolute value

1 observable outcome

01
Read absolute value as distance

Interpret absolute value as distance and solve equations or comparisons by separating the required cases.

Must know
  • Absolute value is a nonnegative distance from zero or another reference point.
  • An equation |u| = c with c > 0 produces two cases; a negative c produces no real solution.
Evidence boundary

Case splitting must preserve the entire expression inside the absolute-value bars.

Common trap

Absolute value means delete a minus sign. It measures distance and may require two algebraic cases.

A5

Ratios and proportions

2 observable outcomes

01
Normalize ratios and rates

Compare ratios, unit rates, percentages, and proportional quantities only after aligning the same base and units.

Must know
  • A ratio compares ordered quantities; swapping numerator and denominator changes its meaning.
  • Percent change uses the original quantity as the denominator unless the prompt defines another base.
Evidence boundary

A similar-looking fraction is not comparable until both quantities and units refer to the same basis.

Common trap

Percent change is final minus initial divided by final. The ordinary comparison base is the original value.

02
Scale proportional models

Solve direct, inverse, and multistep proportion problems and verify that the direction of change matches the model.

Must know
  • Direct proportionality keeps a ratio constant; inverse proportionality keeps a product constant.
  • A reasonableness check should confirm whether increasing one quantity should increase or decrease the other.
Evidence boundary

Do not assume proportionality merely because two quantities change together.

Common trap

Every rate relationship scales directly. Some models are inverse or nonproportional; the stated relationship controls the equation.

A6

Graphical analysis

2 observable outcomes

01
Extract quantities from graphs

Read axes, scale, units, points, intervals, slope, and intercept from a graph before calculating or comparing.

Must know
  • Axis labels and tick spacing define the quantitative meaning of every mark.
  • Slope is a change ratio with units; an intercept is a modeled value at a reference input.
Evidence boundary

Do not extrapolate beyond the displayed or stated domain without an explicit model.

Common trap

The steepest-looking line always has the greatest slope. Slope comparisons require the axis scales and units, not visual angle alone.

02
Move between models

Match equations, tables, and graphs by testing invariant features such as intercepts, slope, curvature, symmetry, and domain.

Must know
  • A small set of structural features can reject most mismatches before point-by-point calculation.
  • Equivalent representations must agree on both values and allowed inputs.
Evidence boundary

A few matching sample points do not prove two models identical over every input.

Common trap

One shared point means a graph and equation are the same model. Many different models intersect; compare defining behavior and domain.

B

Data Analysis, Interpretation, and Sufficiency

2 observable outcomes

01
Read data before summarizing

Identify variables, groups, units, totals, trends, and anomalies in tables or displays before selecting a numerical summary.

Must know
  • A total, percentage, rate, and percentage-point difference answer different questions.
  • The display’s population and denominator define what can be concluded.
Evidence boundary

Describe association or displayed change without converting it into an unsupported causal claim.

Common trap

A larger percentage always represents a larger count. Counts depend on both the percentage and the group size.

02
Test information sufficiency

Decide whether each supplied statement, alone or together, determines the requested quantity without solving beyond what the decision requires.

Must know
  • Sufficiency asks whether a unique answer follows, not whether one compatible answer can be found.
  • Each statement must be tested independently before testing their combination.
Evidence boundary

Do not import unstated positivity, integrality, geometry, or domain assumptions.

Common trap

A statement is sufficient if it lets me construct one answer. It must exclude every alternative answer allowed by the prompt.

C

Quantitative Comparison

2 observable outcomes

01
Compare without over-solving

Compare two quantities by simplifying a difference or ratio, bounding values, or selecting valid test cases.

Must know
  • The sign of A − B directly identifies their order when it can be determined.
  • Bounds and monotonic behavior can settle a comparison without exact values.
Evidence boundary

Division-based comparisons require a known nonzero denominator and sign-aware reasoning.

Common trap

Exact numerical values are required before two quantities can be compared. Structure, bounds, or a sign test may determine the relationship directly.

02
Prove indeterminacy with counterexamples

Choose admissible values that produce different comparison outcomes when the relationship cannot be determined.

Must know
  • One valid case can disprove an ‘always’ claim; two valid cases with different outcomes prove indeterminacy.
  • Every test value must satisfy all stated restrictions.
Evidence boundary

A counterexample outside the prompt’s domain is not evidence.

Common trap

If two convenient examples agree, the relationship is determined. Agreement among examples does not replace a proof; search boundary and sign-changing cases.

D

Probability and Statistics

2 observable outcomes

01
Build the sample space

Model simple, conditional, complementary, and multi-stage probabilities from a complete sample space or event structure.

Must know
  • Probability is favorable measure divided by total measure only when the modeled outcomes use the appropriate weighting.
  • ‘At least one’ is often cleanly computed with a complement; conditional probability changes the denominator.
Evidence boundary

Do not assume independence, equal likelihood, or replacement unless the experiment supports it.

Common trap

Separate events can always be multiplied. Multiplication requires conditional probabilities or justified independence.

02
Choose and interpret statistics

Compute and interpret center, spread, weighted averages, percentiles, and simple distribution comparisons from the supplied data.

Must know
  • Mean, median, and mode respond differently to skew and outliers.
  • A weighted mean uses the count or weight attached to each value, not an unweighted average of subgroup means.
Evidence boundary

A summary statistic does not reveal the full distribution or establish causation.

Common trap

The mean of group means is always the overall mean. Subgroup means must be weighted by their group sizes unless those sizes are equal.

II

Applied Mathematics (Word) Problems

10 official questions · 1 displayed leaf · 2 DAT TRAIN objectives

A

Applied Mathematics (Word) Problems

2 observable outcomes

01
Translate the situation into a model

Name the requested quantity, define variables, align units, and translate rates, percentages, mixtures, motion, work, finance, or measurement constraints into equations.

Must know
  • A unit ledger exposes missing conversions and distinguishes a rate from a quantity.
  • The model should state what each variable measures before numbers are substituted.
Evidence boundary

The official label is broad; DAT TRAIN examples may organize common contexts but do not claim unpublished ADA context quotas.

Common trap

The operation can be chosen from the numbers alone. The relationships and units determine the model before arithmetic begins.

02
Solve, estimate, and audit the result

Solve an applied model, use the digital calculator selectively, and reject results that fail magnitude, unit, sign, domain, or context checks.

Must know
  • An estimate predicts the answer’s sign and scale before exact arithmetic.
  • A calculated value must be interpreted in the requested unit and feasible context.
Evidence boundary

Calculator output is arithmetic evidence, not proof that the chosen model or interpretation is valid.

Common trap

A calculator display is automatically the answer. Round, label, and test the result against the original situation.

A DEPENDABLE STUDY ORDER

Build proof before pace.

The official hierarchy defines what may be tested, not how it must be taught. This order makes later decisions depend on representations and checks already in place.

  1. 01

    Algebraic grammar

    Preserve grouping, sign, domain, and equivalence before speed. Equations, inequalities, exponents, absolute value, and ratios share one symbolic language.

  2. 02

    Representations

    Move deliberately among equations, tables, graphs, units, and words. The same relationship should survive every change of view.

  3. 03

    Decision problems

    Practice sufficiency and quantitative comparison as proof tasks: determine what must be true without doing work the question does not require.

  4. 04

    Uncertainty and data

    Build sample spaces, choose statistics, preserve denominators, and keep association separate from causation.

  5. 05

    Applied translation

    Name the target, define variables, align units, model the relationship, estimate, calculate, and audit the result in context.

SEVEN PRACTICE ROUTES

Build the proof.
Switch the method. Protect time.

This study map is not a question bank, a calibrated form, or a score converter. Choose a focused topic to read a lesson and work through explained examples, or mix algebra, graphs, comparison, probability, statistics, and applied mathematics in one practice circuit.

The question bank includes 1,046 Quantitative questions. Build a complete 40-question form with 30 Mathematical and 10 Applied Mathematics questions, using a 45-minute clock or untimed practice. Explanations appear after submission; a keyboard-and-touch calculator, saved-session recovery, and raw results are available. Automated validation is complete; independent mathematics and assessment review, representative-device accessibility testing, and student pilot analysis remain open, so the items remain draft and uncalibrated.

Build a Quantitative completion form →Open Section-Wide Mixed Retrieval →Open Algebra Foundations →Open Graphical and Data Reasoning →Open Quantitative Comparison →Open Probability and Statistics →Open Applied Mathematics →