QUANTITATIVE REASONING · QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON

Prove what is fixed.
Witness what varies.

Use an exact difference, separated bounds, or two admissible cases to reach the strongest conclusion the stated domain supports.

1guided lesson
3retrieval prompts
4practice questions
5choices per item

The comparison proof

Difference. Bound. Witness. Conclude.

  1. 01Difference

    Simplify A − B exactly and read its sign whenever structure allows.

  2. 02Bound

    Compare the tightest possible ranges before evaluating every value.

  3. 03Witness

    Use two allowed inputs with different outcomes to prove variation.

  4. 04Conclude

    State one fixed relation only when it holds across the full domain.

Quantitative Comparison is an official Mathematical Problems line. DAT TRAIN’s objectives, examples, and five-choice questions are original instruction and do not imply an unpublished topic quota.

One connected topic lesson

Make the domain part of the proof.

Every model keeps exact values, bounds, allowed inputs, and witness outcomes visible so the conclusion can be independently checked.

01

LESSON 1 · 17 MIN

QR-MAT-QCO-01QR-MAT-QCO-02

Quantitative comparison

Determine whether one quantity is greater, the quantities are equal, or the relationship varies by using exact differences, safe bounds, or admissible counterexamples.

ESSENTIAL QUESTIONCan structure prove one relationship for every allowed value—or can two valid cases force different conclusions?
Exact difference + separated bounds

Prove one relationship without calculating more than the claim needs.

Difference certificateA − B = 34 − 51 = −17

A negative exact difference proves that Quantity B is greater. No decimal approximation is needed.

Bounds certificatemin(A) = 11 > 10 = max(B)

The ranges never touch, so every allowed value makes Quantity A greater.

Exact-difference proof ledger
Quantity AQuantity BA − BCertified relation
3451−17Quantity B is greater
Separated-bounds proof ledger
QuantityMinimumMaximumWhat the interval proves
Quantity A = x + 51114Every value lies above 10
Quantity B = 101010The fixed comparison ceiling is 10

Overlapping ranges alone prove neither equality nor variation. Switch to structure or admissible cases before drawing a conclusion.

Complete domain + disagreeing witnesses

Break a universal claim with two cases the prompt actually allows.

Text equivalent: the reciprocal comparison permits the nonzero integers negative four, negative three, negative two, negative one, one, two, three, and four. Zero is excluded.

Complete reciprocal domain: {−4, −3, −2, −1, 1, 2, 3, 4}. Zero is excluded before any value is tested.

Complete square-versus-linear case ledger
Allowed inputQuantity AQuantity BOutcomeEvidence role
x=−39−3Quantity A is greaterSelected witness
x=−24−1Quantity A is greaterSupporting case
x=−111The quantities are equalSupporting case
x=115Quantity B is greaterSelected witness
x=247Quantity B is greaterSupporting case
x=399The quantities are equalSupporting case
Complete reciprocal-versus-input case ledger
Allowed inputQuantity AQuantity BOutcomeEvidence role
x=−4−1/4−4Quantity A is greaterSelected witness
x=−3−1/3−3Quantity A is greaterSupporting case
x=−2−1/2−2Quantity A is greaterSupporting case
x=−1−1−1The quantities are equalSupporting case
x=111The quantities are equalSupporting case
x=21/22Quantity B is greaterSelected witness
x=31/33Quantity B is greaterSupporting case
x=41/44Quantity B is greaterSupporting case

Witness rows say “Selected witness” in text as well as using a visual highlight. Each selected pair contains one case where A is greater and one where B is greater.

EXACT COMPARISON MODELS · COMPLETE CASE TABLES + TEXT EQUIVALENT INCLUDED
01

Subtract before solving

The sign of Quantity A minus Quantity B identifies the relationship when the difference can be simplified safely.

  • A positive difference means Quantity A is greater.
  • Do not divide by an expression whose sign or nonzero status is unknown.
02

Use the tightest bound

If the smallest possible value of one quantity exceeds the largest possible value of the other, the comparison is settled without exact evaluation.

  • Carry every domain restriction into the bound.
  • Overlapping bounds do not prove equality or indeterminacy by themselves.
03

Disprove with admissible cases

When a fixed relationship is not guaranteed, two allowed inputs that produce different outcomes prove that no single relationship follows.

  • Every witness must satisfy the complete stated domain.
  • Two agreeing examples are not a universal proof.

Worked example

For x in {−3, −2, −1, 1, 2, 3}, compare Quantity A = x² with Quantity B = 2x + 3.

  1. 1

    The domain is finite and explicitly excludes 0, so only the six listed values are admissible.

  2. 2

    At x = −3, Quantity A is 9 and Quantity B is −3, so Quantity A is greater.

  3. 3

    At x = 1, Quantity A is 1 and Quantity B is 5, so Quantity B is greater. The two valid outcomes disagree.

ConclusionThe relationship varies across the allowed domain; no single greater-than or equality statement is determined.

Calculator decision ledger

Model mentally
Simplify the difference, identify usable bounds, and write every allowed-value restriction before entering numbers.
Estimate
Predict the sign or locate a likely sign-changing boundary before exact evaluation.
Calculator
Use arithmetic only when exact simplification, bounds, or small admissible cases do not settle the relation.
Audit
Check denominator signs and confirm that every counterexample satisfies the complete stated domain.

Close the notes first

Retrieve the proof.

01What does the sign of A − B prove?
Positive means A is greater, negative means B is greater, and zero means equality.

Subtracting places the comparison on one exact sign test.

02When do bounds prove Quantity A is greater?
When the minimum possible A is greater than the maximum possible B.

Then every admissible A lies above every admissible B.

03What proves that a relationship varies?
Two admissible cases that produce different comparison outcomes.

A single fixed conclusion cannot survive both valid cases.

Randomized retrieval bank

Now choose the proof before the answer.

Both objectives appear twice. Question order and all five answer choices shuffle while each conclusion remains independently recomputable.

4 PRACTICE QUESTIONS

Retrieve before you review.

Question order and all five answer options are shuffled when you begin. The correct answer stays attached to the same underlying choice.

Scope and score notice

Use results for study guidance.

The ADA names Quantitative Comparison but does not publish a separate question quota for it. DAT TRAIN does not invent one.

These original questions are draft and uncalibrated. Accuracy can direct review; it cannot predict an official DAT score.